Data from: Slow development as an evolutionary cost of long life

1. Life-history theory predicts a trade-off between early-life fitness and lifespan. While the focus traditionally has been on the fecundity-lifespan trade-off, there are strong reasons to expect trade-offs with growth rate and/or development time. 2. We investigated the roles of growth rate and development time in the evolution of lifespan in two independent selection experiments in the outcrossing nematode Caenorhabditis remanei. 3. First, we found that selection under heat-shock leads to the evolution of increased lifespan without fecundity costs, but at the cost of slower development. 4. Thereafter, the putative evolutionary links between development time, growth rate, fecundity, heat-shock resistance and lifespan were independently assessed in the second experiment by directly selecting for fast or slow development. This experiment confirmed our initial findings, since selection for slow development resulted in the evolution of long lifespan and increased heat-shock resistance. 5. Because there were no consistent trade-offs with growth rate or fecundity, our results highlight the key role of development rate – differentiation of the somatic cells per unit of time – in the evolution of lifespan. 6. Since development time is under strong selection in nature, reduced somatic maintenance resulting in shorter lifespan may be a widespread cost of rapid development.