Dataset for Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group review updates priority-setting exercise

Objective: To engage in a priority-setting exercise with both clinicians and consumers to determine systematic reviews of highest priority to update.
Study Design & Setting: The US Satellite of the Cochrane Pregnancy & Childbirth Group (US-PCG) narrowed a list of over 600 review titles due for updating down to 97 review titles based on US relevance. The US-PCG then used the Delphi method to explore consensus on which titles to prioritize for updating. In Round 1, participants self-identified as a clinician/researcher or consumer, and then ranked titles into “high”, “medium”, and “low” priority groups. In Round 2, participants were given Round 1 results and asked to rank their top 5 titles. Results were analyzed within and between groups.

目标：与临床医生和消费者共同参与优先级设定实践，以确定需要更新的最高优先级的系统评价。研究设计及环境：美国科克伦妊娠与分娩小组（US-PCG）基于美国相关性，将即将更新的600余条评价标题列表缩减至97条。随后，US-PCG运用德尔菲法探讨更新优先级标题的共识。在第一轮中，参与者自我标明其为临床医生/研究人员或消费者身份，随后将标题分为“高”、“中”和“低”优先级组。在第二轮中，参与者获得了第一轮的结果，并被要求对其前五名标题进行排名。结果在组内及组间进行了分析。