Replication Data for: Kenwick, M., Lee, S., & Kolcak, B. “Military Experience and Casualty Sensitivity in Elite Discourse: Evidence from the U.S. Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.” Journal of Conflict Resolution. Forthcoming

Veterans are disproportionately represented among political elites, and the question of whether military experience shapes their behavior is a central puzzle in the study of international relations. Existing theories link military experience with hawkish or dovish foreign policy preferences. Rather than determining their positions on the use of force ex ante, we argue that domain-specific knowledge and their elevated social status will make veterans less likely to change their expressed positions, especially in response to wartime casualties. We test our argument by analyzing Congressional speeches referencing the American wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, finding strong support for our expectations. Our core insight is that veteran politicians are partisans first and veterans second, and that military experience may say more about whether they update, rather than establish, their political positions.