Anast et al., 2022, MicrobiologyOpen - Table S2

<strong>Table S2. Mapping read statistics of individual replicates from the re-analysis of plasmid data of Assisi et al. 2021, Guariglia-Oropeza et al. 2018, and Tang et al. 2015. </strong> <br> Data is presented by study, from top to bottom: (1) Tang et al. 2015, (2) Guariglia-Oropeza et al. 2018, and (3) Assisi et al. 2021. “Sample” specifies from what sample replicate each statistic data is generated. The “SRA accession” column lists the sequence read archive (SRA) accession number for the corresponding sample. It is important to not that reads from the Guariglia-Oropeza et al. 2018 study that were submitted to the SRA are not the raw reads containing pLM80 reads. We obtained unfiltered reads by directly contacting the authors of this study. “Plasmid” denotes what plasmid is harbored within the strain from the sample. “Total mappings” means the total reads that were mapped to the chromosome and plasmid contigs. “Length of the entire genome (sum contigs)” shows the sum of all base pairs from the chromosome and plasmid contigs. “Length of plasmid (sum contigs)” designates the sum of base pairs of the predicted plasmid contigs. “Reads mapped to plasmid” displays the total reads mapped to plasmid contigs. “Chromosome coverage” denotes the total read coverage of all the chromosome contigs. “Plasmid coverage” indicates the total read coverage of all plasmid contigs. “Percent of total mappings that are attributed to plasmid contigs” shows the percentage of all mapped reads in the sample that were assigned to plasmid contigs.