Table describing motion and SNR data, stratified by the two ‘high SNR’ (n = 18) and ‘low SNR’ (n = 19) subgroups.

Aside from macro-motion variables which were not appropriately distributed, comparisons of transformed motion or raw SNR variables between low and high groups using t-tests were significant in all cases (t(35)>2.06, pTable describing motion and SNR data, stratified by the two ‘high SNR’ (n = 18) and ‘low SNR’ (n = 19) subgroups.