five

Comparing direct and indirect selfing rate estimates: when are population-structure estimates reliable?

收藏
DataONE2020-06-24 更新2025-04-19 收录
下载链接:
https://search.dataone.org/view/sha256:6b60ba828b67d9d10f188e9378de0a4a625a23e3648321814333018b2be2cc47
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
The rate of self-fertilization (that is, selfing) is a key evolutionary parameter in hermaphroditic species, yet obtaining accurate estimates of selfing rates in natural populations can be technically challenging. Most published estimates are derived from population-level heterozygote deficiency (that is, FIS) or identity disequilibria (for example, the software RMES (robust multilocus estimate of selfing)). These indirect methods can be applied to population genetic survey data, whereas direct methods using progeny arrays require much larger data sets that are often difficult to collect in natural populations or even require captive breeding. Unfortunately, indirect methods rely on assumptions that can be problematic, such as negating biparental inbreeding, inbreeding disequilibrium and (for FIS) the presence of null alleles. The performance of indirect estimates against progeny-array estimates is still largely unknown. Here we used both direct progeny-array and indirect population-lev...
创建时间:
2025-04-01
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务