Supplementary Dataset for: Patient Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology—An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Survey Demonstrating Preference for Physician Oversight

The supplementary materials provide comprehensive supporting data and methodological transparency for this exploratory cross-sectional study evaluating patient attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) in dermatology. Four supplementary tables present detailed stratified analyses: Supplementary Table 1: Participant demographics by technology comfort level Supplementary Table 2: Survey responses by technology comfort level Supplementary Table 3: Participant demographics by age group Supplementary Table 4: Survey responses by age group These stratified analyses enable a deeper examination of how demographic characteristics and self-reported technology comfort influence perceptions of AI in dermatologic care, extending beyond the summary findings reported in the main manuscript. The full survey instrument is included to ensure transparency and reproducibility, allowing readers to evaluate question design and response structure. The JAAD survey checklist is provided to demonstrate adherence to established reporting standards for survey-based research. Together, these materials strengthen the rigor, transparency, and interpretability of the study and provide the necessary detail to contextualize findings.本项探索性横断面研究旨在评估皮肤病学领域患者对人工智能（Artificial Intelligence，AI）的态度，本补充材料为该研究提供了全面的支撑数据与方法学透明化内容。 本研究包含四份补充表格，用以呈现精细化的分层分析结果： 补充表1：按技术接受度水平划分的受试者人口统计学特征 补充表2：按技术接受度水平划分的调查问卷应答情况 补充表3：按年龄组划分的受试者人口统计学特征 补充表4：按年龄组划分的调查问卷应答情况 此类分层分析可深入剖析人口统计学特征与自我报告的技术接受度如何影响受试者对皮肤病诊疗中人工智能的认知，弥补了主稿件仅报告总结性发现的局限。 本补充材料同时附完整调查问卷工具，以保障研究的透明性与可复现性，便于读者评估问卷的问题设计与应答结构；此外还提供了美国皮肤病学会杂志（JAAD）调查问卷核查清单，用以证明本研究遵循了基于调查问卷的科研报告的既定规范。 上述补充材料共同提升了本研究的严谨性、透明性与阐释性，并为研究结果的情境化解读提供了必要的细节支撑。