"Recommended versus Certified Repositories: Mind the Gap"

This data set supports the paper "Recommended versus Certified Repositories: Mind the Gap". In this paper, we examined which repositories are recommended and/or certified by a number of organisations. We analysed the selection criteria for recommendation and certification to create a shared set of possible best-practice criteria (umbrella categories) suggested to be used by all parties involved with data repositories. This data set includes our compiled list of recommended repositories by 12 organisations (see file), our compiled list of certified repositories (certified by the DSA, ICSU-WDS, NESTOR, TRAC, and ISO 16363/TDR), the criteria used to recommend repositories, the criteria used to certify repositories (both latter files include the steps taken in the analysis towards the distillation of the criteria into the umbrella categories), a list of the examined repositories against their focus-discipline, and a comparative list of the examined recommended and certified repositories to depict overlap between the two. All files include links to the relevant sources of information.本数据集为论文《Recommended versus Certified Repositories: Mind the Gap》提供支撑。本研究中，我们调研了多家机构所推荐和/或认证的数据存储库（data repositories）。我们分析了推荐与认证的遴选标准，旨在构建一套通用的最佳实践标准总括类别，供所有涉及数据存储库的相关方使用。本数据集包含以下内容：由12家机构汇编的推荐数据存储库列表（详见对应文件）；经认证的数据存储库列表（认证方包括DSA、ICSU-WDS、NESTOR、TRAC及ISO 16363/TDR）；数据存储库推荐遴选标准；数据存储库认证遴选标准（后两份文件均包含了将标准凝练为总括类别的分析过程）；按核心学科分类的被调研数据存储库列表；以及用于呈现被调研的推荐类与认证类数据存储库重叠情况的对比列表。所有文件均附有所涉信息来源的链接。