Tagged near-synonyms in requirements specifications

The spreadsheet complements the paper "Detecting Terminological Ambiguity in User Stories: Tool and Experimentation" published in the Information & Software Technology Journal.

It consists of a set of term couples that belong to 28 data sets, and that were considered as near-synonyms by some manual taggers. The spreadsheet has a single sheet with the following columns:

- Dataset: an identifier from 1 to 28 that refers to the data set
- Type: noun or verb
- Term A: the first term
- Term B: the second term
- T1: a boolean value that states if the first manual tagger considered the terms as near-synonyms
- T2: a boolean value that states if the second manual tagger considered the terms as near-synonyms
- Gold set 1: a boolean value that indicates if the couple is in the first version of the gold set of near-synonyms, created by the data set owner based on the inputs of T1 and T2
- T3 (manual): a boolean value that states if the time-constrained, manual tagger indicated the two terms in that row as near-synonyms
- T4 (REVV-Light): a boolean value that states if the time-constrained, REVV-Light supported tagger indicated the two terms in that row as near-synonyms
- Gold set 2: a boolean value that indicates if the couple is in the first version of the gold set of near-synonyms, created by the data set owner based on all the other inputs