Progress Without Supersession: Philosophy's Long Memory and the Empirical Premises of the Progress Debate — data, code and figures

Companion materials for the article Progress Without Supersession: Philosophy's Long Memory and the Empirical Premises of the Progress Debate (author identity withheld for double-anonymous review; submitted). Contents: the cleaned corpus of 52,584 research articles from 18 generalist philosophy journals (1876–2025) with fused metadata from OpenAlex, Crossref, Semantic Scholar and Web of Science (derived quantities only; WoS-licensed content withheld); 212,157 in-corpus citation links; coverage tables; all analysis outputs for philosophy and nine comparison fields (history, literary studies, psychology, economics, physics, evolutionary biology, molecular biology, mathematics, philosophy of science): disruption indices, source-combination novelty, community integration, citation concentration and reference age, delayed recognition, topic partitions and lifecycles, and the re-reading test (whether delayed recognition is coupled to subsequent topic growth) for every field; the full Python pipeline with per-field configurations; and the figures. See README.md for the column dictionary and licensing note.