Dataset for multistage magmatic-to-hydrothermal processes elucidate the petrogenetic links in an ultramafic-alkaline-carbonatite complex

Supplementary material associated with this article includes detailed analytical methods and comprehensive datasets: complicated age data for South China Neoproterozoic rocks (Table S1), mineral proportions (Table S2), mineral chemistry of clinopyroxene (Table S3), biotite (Table S4), amphibole (Table S5), nepheline (Table S6), cancrinite (Table S7), and calcite (Table S8), zircon U-Pb ages (Table S9), whole‑rock major and trace element compositions (Table S10), Sr‑Nd and Lu‑Hf isotopic data (Tables S11, S13) along with isotopic results for comparison (Tables S12, S14), in situ Sr isotope compositions of calcite (Table S15), whole‑rock C‑O isotope data (Table S16), and fractional crystallization modeling results (Table S17). It also contains supplementary figures showing zircon U‑Pb age distribution in South China (Fig. S1), a Si/Al versus Ca classification diagram for cancrinite (Fig. S2), trace element compositions of the Pinghe carbonatites versus the Mawozi marble (Fig. S3), whole‑rock trace element variations in the studied suite (Fig. S4), and elemental partitioning during carbonatite‑ijolite melt immiscibility (Fig. S5), together with a list of references relevant to emplacement ages and chemical data.