Is ITS2 more successful in angiosperm DNA barcoding than the entire ITS, ITS1, matK and trnH-psbA regions? A review. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 82: e155. https://doi.org/10.3989/ajbm.624

Aygören Uluer D. 2025. Is ITS2 more successful in angiosperm DNA barcoding than the entire ITS, ITS1, matK and trnH-psbA regions? A review. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 82: e155. https://doi.org/10.3989/ajbm.624 Appendix 1: Table of the reviewed studies. Data is organized in the following order: Authors of the study and year of publication (full citations are given in the last column), study group, regions included other than ITS2, PCR amplification success rate, PCR sequencing success rate, total ITS2 length, correct species identification rate, correct genus identification rate, the most efficient region(s) chosen by the study, all as reported by each study; primers employed, plant part used (e.g., leaves, tea bags, stems etc.) and material type (e.g., field collected, herbarium specimen etc.).Aygören Uluer D. 2025年。《ITS2区域在被子植物DNA条形码中是否比完整ITS、ITS1、matK和trnH-psbA区域更具优势？一项综述》。《马德里植物园年鉴》（Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid）82卷:e155。https://doi.org/10.3989/ajbm.624 附录1：已综述研究一览表。本数据集的数据编排顺序如下：研究作者与发表年份（完整引文见末列）、研究类群、除ITS2外纳入的分析区域、聚合酶链式反应（Polymerase Chain Reaction, PCR）扩增成功率、PCR测序成功率、ITS2总长度、物种正确鉴定率、属级正确鉴定率、该研究选定的最优区域（以上数据均来自各原始研究的报告结果）；此外还包含所用引物、实验所用植物材料部位（如叶片、茶包、茎秆等）以及样本类型（如野外采集样本、馆藏标本等）。