Sociological Analysis of Law on the Possibility of Implementing Restorative Justice in Corruption Crime Cases in Indonesia

Indonesia's corruption eradication law still adheres to the paradigm of retributive justice in punishing the perpetrators of corruption, namely retaliation. Criminal retaliation arises because criminal law itself is built on the basis of indeterminism thinking which basically views humans as having free will to act. This retributive justice paradigm is certainly not in line with the big goal of eradicating corruption, which in turn becomes an obstacle to efforts to recover state assets through recovering state financial losses in corruption in Indonesia. Thus, the principle of Restorative Justice is needed which emphasizes the repair of losses caused or related to criminal acts carried out through a cooperative process that involves all parties (stakeholders). This paper uses a descriptive analytical research method by conducting a literature study, which collects various data and information about the possibility of applying Restorative Justice in cases of corruption in the perspective of the sociology of law.

印度尼西亚的反腐败法依旧秉承着惩罚性正义的范式，即报复。犯罪报复的产生源于刑法本身建立在不确定性思维的基础之上，其基本观点认为人类拥有自由意志去行为。这一惩罚性正义范式显然与根除腐败这一宏伟目标相悖，进而成为印尼恢复国家资产的努力——通过追回腐败造成的国家经济损失——的障碍。因此，恢复性正义的原则亟待实施，该原则强调通过涉及所有各方（利益相关者）的协作过程修复由犯罪行为造成或与之相关的损失。本文采用描述性分析研究方法，通过文献研究，收集了关于从法律社会学的视角探讨在腐败案件中应用恢复性正义的可能性的各种数据和信息的案例研究。