Comparisons of performance levels between early and late sessions during training with roving stimuli, using Mann-Whitney U test.

Results are presented separately for pre-flanker training (left half of the table) and for flanker training (right half). An FDR correction for α-levels was performed for multiple comparisons due to the measures of performance under assessment (pre-flanker training, monkey 1: 20%: α = .05×1/3 = .0167; 30%: α = .05×1/3 = .0167; 40%: α = .05×3/3 = .05; pre-flanker training, monkey 2: 20%: α = .05×3/3 = .05; 30%: α = .05×1/3 = .0167; 40%: α = .05×1/3 = .0167; flanker training, monkey 1: 20%: α = .05×3/3 = .05; 30%: α = .05×3/3 = .05; 40%: α = .05×2/3 = .0333; flanker training, monkey 2: 20%: α = .05×3/3 = .05; 30%: α = .05×2/3 = .0333; 40%: α = .05×2/3 = .0333). For changes in reaction time, an FDR correction was carried out to take the two measures of RT, RTcorrect and RTerror, into account (pre-flanker training, monkey 1: 20%, 30% & 40%: α = .05×2/2 = .05; pre-flanker training, monkey 2: 20%%, 30% & 40%: α = .05×1/2 = .025; flanker training, monkey 1: 20%%, 30% & 40%: α = .05×1/2 = .025; flanker training, monkey 2: 20%%, 30% & 40%: α = .05×1/2 = .025). Significant changes are indicated by an asterisk.Comparisons of performance levels between early and late sessions during training with roving stimuli, using Mann-Whitney U test.