five

WASH Benefits Bangladesh Cluster Randomized Trial

收藏
NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-05-01 收录
下载链接:
https://clinepidb.org/ce/app/record/dataset/DS_c56b76b581
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
The WASH Benefits Study Publications from the project can be found by clicking here Related studies: WASH Benefits Kenya Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) Background: During the first two years of life, children born in low-income countries are at risk for enteric infections due to poor water quality, sanitation conditions, and caregiver handwashing practices (WASH). During this period, children are also at risk for undernutrition. Beyond the acute morbidity and suffering caused by enteric infections and undernutrition, observational evidence also suggests that repeated infections alone and in combination with undernutrition in the first years of life can have lasting and detrimental effects on longer-term physical growth, cognitive development, and adult human capital. The WASH Benefits studies provide rigorous evidence on the health and developmental benefits of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions during the first years of life. A cluster-randomized controlled trial measured the impact of intervention among newborn infants in rural Bangladesh. The study is large in scope (> 5,000 newborns) and has seven arms (six treatment arms and a control arm). Primary outcomes were measured after two years of intervention. Objectives: The goal of the WASH Benefits studies is to generate rigorous evidence about the impacts of sanitation, water quality, handwashing, and nutrition interventions on child health and development in the first years of life. The WASH Benefits Bangladesh study is highly comparable to the WASH Benefits Kenya study; both cluster randomized trials investigated the effects of the same six treatment arms. The study has three primary scientific objectives: Measure the impact of sanitation, water quality, handwashing, and nutrition interventions on child health and development after 2 years of intervention. Determine whether there are larger reductions in diarrhea when providing a combined water, sanitation and handwashing intervention compared to each component alone. Determine whether there are larger effects on growth and development from combining a) daily supplemental nutrition with b) a combined water, sanitation and handwashing intervention compared to each component alone. The study has three secondary scientific objectives: (Data is not currently available on ClinEpiDB.org.) Measure the impact of nutritional supplements and household environmental interventions on environmental enteropathy biomarkers, and more clearly elucidate this potential pathway between environmental interventions and child growth and development. Measure the impact of sanitation, water quality, handwashing and nutritional interventions on intestinal parasitic infection prevalence and intensity. Measure the association between parasitic infection and other measures of enteric health, including acute diarrhea and environmental enteropathy biomarkers. The tertiary scientific objective of the study was to measure the impact of interventions on the following outcomes: (Data is not currently available on ClinEpiDB.org.) Weight-for-age at 1 and 2 years Weight-for-height at 1 and 2 years Underweight at 2 years Wasting at 2 years Severe stunting at 2 years Head circumference-for-age at 1 year and 2 years Soil-transmitted helminth infection at 2 years Protozoan infection at 2 years Verbal Communicative Development Inventory at 1 year WHO motor milestones at 1 year Acute respiratory illness All cause mortality Methodology: Geographic Location/Study Sites: The trial was conducted in rural villages in Gazipur, Kishoreganj, Mymensingh, and Tangail districts of Bangladesh. The majority of the population uses shallow tubewells for drinking water, which are known to be frequently contaminated with fecal indicator bacteria. Dates of Data Collection: May 2012 - November 2015 Study Design: Cluster-randomized controlled trial with 6 treatment arms and a double-sized control arm. Pregnant women were enrolled, and outcomes were assessed in the children following 12 and 24 months of intervention. Eligibility Criteria: The study communities must have met the following criteria: Rural communities Drinking water that has low levels of arsenic and iron, but sources are known to be frequently contaminated with fecal indicator bacteria Low levels of fully hygienic latrine coverage Levels of childhood stunting >30% No previous participation in other studies Not located in areas completely submerged during the monsoon season Study Arms: Clusters were randomized to one of 7 study arms. Intervention delivery occurred within 3 months after enrollment of pregnant women, prior to or as close to birth as possible. Compounds shared a latrine, so sanitation and handwashing interventions were delivered a the compound-level. Nutritional interventions were delivered directly to the child participant within households. Water quality: The study delivered a 10-liter insulated water storage vessel with a lid and tap, and a regular supply of free chlorine tablets (Aquatabs®, sodium dichloroisocyanurate) to households of target children to improve the microbiological quality of their drinking water. Non-target households in the compound did not receive the water intervention. Behavior change messages were focused on the consistent provision of treated water to all children living in the household. Sanitation: The sanitation intervention included three hardware components: (1) All latrines in the compound were replaced or upgraded to dual pit latrines with a water seal. If the target child's household did not have its own latrine, the project built one. (2) Sani-scoop hoes dedicated to the removal of human and animal feces from the compound were provided to all households in the compound. (3) Plastic child potties were provided to all households in the compound that had any children younger than 3 years. The behavior change components of the intervention emphasized the use of the latrine for defecation and the safe disposal of feces in the compound courtyard to prevent contact with young children. Handwashing: The hardware components of the handwashing intervention included two handwashing stations installed in the households of target children. The first station was located in the kitchen (location of food preparation), and included a 16-liter bucket with a tap fitting, a stool, bowl and soapy water bottle. The second station was located near the toilet, and included a 40-liter bucket with tap fitting, stool, bowl and soapy water bottle. The study provided detergent soap to families free of charge to replenish the soapy water bottles. The behavior change component of the intervention focused messaging for handwashing at critical times: after defecation, after cleaning a child who has defecated, before food preparation, and before eating or feeding a child. Water quality + sanitation + handwashing (WSH): Households received all three of the interventions given to the the water quality, sanitation, and handwashing study arms. Nutrition: The nutrition intervention targeted target children. Mothers were encouraged to exclusively breastfeed their children through age 6 months. When newborns reached 6 months of age, mothers were encouraged to continue breastfeeding their children until 24 months, and received education about supplementing breastfeeding with healthy complementary foods following infant and young child feeding best practice guidelines from Unicef and WHO. Mothers with target children aged 6-24 months were given 2 10g sachets per day of lipid-based nutrient supplement (LNS), developed and tested through the iLiNS project, which could be mixed into the child's food. Water quality + sanitation + handwashing + nutrition (WSHN): Households received all four of the interventions given to the the water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition study arms. Double-sized passive control arm: No intervention. Units of Data Collection: Each study cluster included a group of proximate household compounds that met eligibility criteria and had eight eligible pregnant women. More than one cluster could have been enrolled in a single village but clusters needed to be separated from each other by a minimum of 15 min (1km) walking distance. Households were the family unit of parents and children, and compounds were groups of households (typically 3-10 households from the same extended family) that share a common courtyard. When multiple pregnant women from a single compound were eligible for enrollment, more than one household may have been enrolled for that compound. Children who were born to the pregnant women initially enrolled in the study were considered "target" (or index) children. Children aged <36 months living in the compound at enrollment and additional children born into study compounds after 6 months were considered "sibling/neighbor" children. Data Collection: A survey at enrollment (year 0, pre-intervention baseline) measured socioeconomic characteristics and demographics (including maternal age, maternal education, electricity access, type of floor, and number of people in the household) for each household as well as water, sanitation, and handwashing infrastructure and behaviors (including type of water source, reported water treatment, defecation location, type of toilet, and presence of water and soap at a handwashing station) for each compound. Adherence to the interventions was measured by surveying each enrolled compound during visits 1 year post-intervention (midline) and 2 years post-intervention (endline). Caregiver reported symptoms were assessed for all study children at enrollment, midline, and endline; anthropometry was assessed in target children 1 at midline and endline. Study Documentation: Analysis protocols and replication files are available on the Open Science Framework Study protocols: WASH-b study design and rationale WASH-b Bangladesh main trial protocol WASH-b Bangladesh primary outcomes analysis plan updates Data collection forms: (used to collect raw data) WASH Benefits, common modules WASH Benefits Bangladesh, midline & endline survey questionnaires Codebooks: (describe variables in the "analytic" data files loaded into ClinEpiDB. Analytic variables were cleaned and potentially derived from raw data files by the WASH Benefits investigators during analysis, and are distinct from the original uncleaned data gathered directly from the data collection forms) Treatment assignments codebook Enrollment characteristics codebook Compound tracking codebook Adherence codebook Anthropometry measurements codebook Diarrhea measurements codebook Consent forms: WASH Benefits Bangladesh Main Trial, list of consent forms WASH Benefits Bangladesh Main Trial, consent forms (English) WASH Benefits Bangladesh Main Trial, consent forms (Bangla) ClinEpiDB Data Integration: Data files were provided to ClinEpiDB as flat, csv files. These datasets were merged by unique ID and redundant or administrative columns were dropped from presentation on ClinEpiDB.org. All dates were dropped to comply with the ethical conduct of human subjects research. Acknowledgements: We thank the WASH Benefits Bangladesh study participants and promoters who participated in the trial, the fieldworkers who delivered the interventions and collected the data for the study, and the managers who ensured that everything ran smoothly. Financial Support: The WASH Benefits Bangladesh trial was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through a grant to the University of California, Berkeley (OPPGD759). Ethics Statement: The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Committee at The International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (PR-11063), the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at the University of California, Berkeley (2011-09-3652), and the institutional review board at Stanford University (25863). Participants gave written informed consent before enrollment. Last Updated: March 8, 2021WASH Benefits Bangladesh was a cluster-randomized trial that assessed improvements in water quality, sanitation, handwashing (WASH interventions) and child nutrition on the primary outcomes of child growth and diarrhea. Geographically matched clusters (groups of household compounds) were randomized to one of six intervention arms (1. water quality, 2. sanitation, 3. handwashing, 4. nutrition, 5. combined water quality + sanitation + handwashing, and 6. combined water quality + sanitation + handwashing + nutrition) or control. Newborns from rural households in Bangladesh were enrolled, and outcomes were measured at 12 and 24 months after intervention delivery.
创建时间:
2023-09-14
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作