CFC outputs LT and CW

We conducted a field test where participants completed the two theoreticalyl strongest carbon footprint calculators (CFCs), calculating their individual, annual CO2-eq emissions. These data shows the outputs of those two CFCs by category and subcategory. All outputs are expressed as tonnes of CO2-eq. While the totals are notably similar, variances are seen in categories and subcategories. These variences suggest different underlying methodologies, despite a similar overall total. This may cause confusion for users who want to reduce their emissions based on their largest emissions categories.本研究开展了一项实地测试，邀请受试者使用两款理论上表现最优的碳足迹计算器（Carbon Footprint Calculators，缩写CFCs），计算各自的年度二氧化碳当量（CO₂-eq）排放量。本数据集包含这两款工具按类别及子类别划分的计算结果，所有输出均以二氧化碳当量吨数为单位进行呈现。尽管两款工具得出的总排放量数值较为接近，但在各类别及子类别层面均存在显著差异。这些差异表明，即便整体总排放量相近，两款工具所采用的底层计算方法论并不相同。这可能会给希望依据自身最大排放类别制定减排方案的用户带来困惑。