Data on societal engagement of Health 4.0 by assessing drivers and challenges for sustainable integration

The data was collected within a mixed-method, first phase consisting of 2 vignettes that help to identify Health 4.0 as an emerging concept. The second phase consists of 4 main criteria with 11 sub criteria analysed with MACBETH method. The data gathered from 6 individuals, 3 academicians (with expertise health management and strategic management), 2 doctors (medical expertise) and one bank manager (expertise in medical insurance). Participants after the indept interviews, are asked to assess each criteria with the steps of MACBETH. Each of them assessed the alternatives of the value tree within a semantic scale from extreme (an alternative is extremely attractive over another), very strong, strong, moderate, weak to very weak (an alternative is very weakly attractive over another). The assessment has done forming a committee on a consensus-based decision-making process. The data was used for an article to determine drivers and challenges of the Health 4.0 concept entitled “Drivers, Challenges, and Integration of Health 4.0 as Societal Engagement” [1]. The data and method can be used in terms of other novel concepts to create insights and to explore to decision makers’ cognitive perspectives.本数据集采用混合研究方法采集，第一阶段包含2个情境案例（vignette），用于辅助界定健康4.0（Health 4.0）这一新兴概念。第二阶段包含4项主标准与11项子标准，采用MACBETH法进行分析。数据采集自6名受访者，其中包括3名拥有健康管理与战略管理专长的学者、2名具备医学专长的医师，以及1名精通医疗保险业务的银行经理。受访者在接受深度访谈后，需按照MACBETH法的步骤对各项标准进行评估。每位受访者均采用语义刻度对价值树中的备选方案进行评估，语义刻度区间从“极端（某一备选方案相较于另一方案极具吸引力）”“极强”“强”“中等”“弱”直至“极弱”（某一备选方案相较于另一方案仅具微弱吸引力）。本次评估通过组建专家委员会，采用基于共识的决策流程开展。本数据集曾用于一篇题为《作为社会参与的健康4.0：驱动因素、挑战与融合》[1]的学术论文，用于明确健康4.0概念的驱动因素与挑战。本数据集与所采用的方法可应用于其他新兴概念研究，为探索决策者的认知视角提供洞见。