Data underlying the thesis: Multiparty Computation: The effect of multiparty computation on firms' willingness to contribute protected data

This thesis-mpc-dataset-public-readme.txt file was generated on 2020-10-20 by Masud PetroniaGENERAL INFORMATION1. Title of Dataset: Data underlying the thesis: Multiparty Computation: The effect of multiparty computation on firms' willingness to contribute protected data2. Author InformationA. Principal Investigator Contact InformationName: Masud PetroniaInstitution: TU Delft, Faculty of Technology, Policy and ManagementAddress: Mekelweg 5, 2628 CD Delft, NetherlandsEmail: [e-mail]: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2798-046X3: Description of dataset: This dataset contains perceptual data of firms' willingness to contribute protected data through multi party computation (MPC). Petronia (2020, ch. 6) draws several conclusions from this dataset and provides recommendations for future research Petronia (2020, ch. 7.4).4. Date of data collection: July-August 20205. Geographic location of data collection: Netherlands6. Information about funding sources that supported the collection of the data: Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, Grant Agreement no 825225 – Safe Data Enabled Economic Development (SAFE-DEED), from the H2020-ICT-2018-2SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION1. Licenses/restrictions placed on the data: CC 02. Links to publications that cite or use the data: Petronia, M. N. (2020). Multiparty Computation: The effect of multiparty computation on firms' willingness to contribute protected data (Master's thesis). Retrieved from http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:b0de4a4b-f5a3-44b8-baa4-a6416cebe26f3. Was data derived from another source? No4. Citation for this dataset: Petronia, M. N. (2020). Multiparty Computation: The effect of multiparty computation on firms' willingness to contribute protected data (Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://data.4tu.nl/. doi:10.4121/13102430DATA & FILE OVERVIEW1. File List: thesis-mpc-dataset-public.xlsxthesis-mpc-dataset-public-readme.txt (this document)2. Relationship between files: Dataset metadata and instructions3. Additional related data collected that was not included in the current data package: Occupation and role of respondents (traceable to unique reference), removed for privacy reasons.4. Are there multiple versions of the dataset? NoMETHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION1. Description of methods used for collection/generation of data: A pre- and post test experimental design. For more information; see Petronia (2020, ch. 5)2. Methods for processing the data: Full instructions are provided by Petronia (2020, ch. 6)3. Instrument- or software-specific information needed to interpret the data: Microsoft Excel can be used to convert the dataset to other formats.4. Environmental/experimental conditions: This dataset comprises three datasets collected through three channels. These channels are Prolific (incentive), LinkedIn/Twitter (voluntarily), and respondents in a lab setting (voluntarily). For more information; see Petronia (2020, ch. 6.1)5. Describe any quality-assurance procedures performed on the data: A thorough examination of consistency and reliability is performed. For more information; see Petronia (2020, ch. 6).6. People involved with sample collection, processing, analysis and/or submission: See Petronia (2020, ch. 6)DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION1. Number of variables: see worksheet experiment_matrix of thesis-mpc-dataset-public.xlsx2. Number of cases/rows: see worksheet experiment_matrix of thesis-mpc-dataset-public.xlsx3. Variable List: see worksheet labels of thesis-mpc-dataset-public.xlsx4. Missing data codes: see worksheet comments of thesis-mpc-dataset-public.xlsx5. Specialized formats or other abbreviations used: Multiparty computation (MPC) and Trusted Third Party (TTP).INSTRUCTIONS1. Petronia (2020, ch. 6) describes associated tests and respective syntax.