The High-Tune Explorer : The Radiative Effect of 3D Clouds

High-Tune:Explorer is a suite of programs developed in the frame of the High-Tune project, supported by the ANR French research agency. The data available on this DOI is linked to the third part of a series of publications in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems. Data for the first two parts are available at https://doi.org/10.14768/29fbfe70-a8e8-41db-914c-b14be9a6f90b. Process-based climate model development harnessing machine learning: III. The Representation of Cumulus Geometry and their 3D Radiative Effects Process-scale development, evaluation and calibration of physically-based parameterizations of clouds and radiation are powerful levers for improving weather and climate models. In a series of papers, we propose a strategy for process-based calibration of climate models that uses machine learning techniques. It relies on systematic comparisons of single-column versions of climate models with explicit simulations of boundary-layer dynamics and clouds (LES). This paper focuses on the calibration of cloud geometry parameters (vertical overlap, horizontal heterogeneity and cloud size) that appear in the parameterization of radiation. The solar component of a radiative transfer scheme that includes a parameterization for 3D radiative effects of clouds (SPARTACUS) is run in offline single-column mode on an ensemble of input cloud profiles synthesized from LES outputs. The space of cloud geometry parameter values is efficiently explored by sampling a large number of parameter sets (configurations) from which radiative metrics are computed using fast surrogate models that emulate the SPARTACUS solver. The sampled configurations are evaluated by comparing these radiative metrics to reference values provided by a 3D radiative transfer Monte Carlo model. The best calibrated configurations yield better predictions of TOA and surface fluxes than the one that uses parameter values computed from the 3D cloud fields: the root-mean-square errors averaged over cumulus cloud fields and solar angles are reduced from ~ 10 W/m² with LES-derived parameters to ~ 5 W/m² with adjusted parameters. However, the calibration of cloud geometry fails to reduce the errors on absorption, which remain around 2 to 4 W/m².