Fagaceae collection

This fileset includes matrices, analysis files and artwork relating to inferences and discussions about phylogenetic relationships in extant and extinct Fagaceae. See <strong>readme.txt</strong> in each archive for content and labelling conventions.<br> <br> <em><strong>Version 1</strong></em> Data, inferences, and exemplary artwork relevant for testing believes expressed in<br> Wilf P, Nixon KC, Gandolfo MA, Cúneo RA (2019). Eocene Fagaceae from Patagonia and Gondwanan legacy in Asian rainforests. <em>Science </em><strong>364, </strong>972 based on a "phylogenetic analysis" of seven morphological traits. <em>Ockham's Razor applied but not used: can we do DNA-scaffolding with seven characters?</em> <em>Why we want to map trait evolution on networks, </em><em>pt. 1 – Introduction</em><em>; </em><em>pt. 2 – Topological ambiguity</em><em>.</em> <br> <em><strong>Version 2</strong></em><em><br> </em> Morphology folder updated. <em>Surviving parsimonists: just tree-naive or tree-blindfolded?</em><em><br> </em> <br> <em><strong>Version 3</strong></em> Added <strong>Jiang et al. 2021 revisited.7z</strong>—reconstructed (phased) haplotype data produced by Jiang et al. (2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12695) for 28 nuclear gene regions; de-constructed into the putative original, high-polymorphic (2ISP-rich) sequence data, i.e. one sequence per individual instead of two phased (hypothetical) haplotypes.<br> <em>A fully resolved, and perfectly misleading, species tree</em><br> <br> <em><strong>Version 4/5</strong></em> Added artwork (<strong>AllesBastarde...png</strong>; language: Deutsch/ German) relating to/ after Cardoni et al. (2022; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.26.433057) and literature cited therein; and (re-)used in/ modified for: Schulze &amp; Grimm (2022, <i>Alles Bastarde</i>: https://doi.org/10.11576/biuz-5864) Related post: <em>Artkonzepte, in Bildern</em><br>