Genome-wide association study and cost-efficient genomic predictions for growth and fillet yield in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Dataset to GWAS, genomic prediction and imputation analysis for the paper "<b>Genome-wide association study and cost-efficient genomic predictions for growth and fillet yield in Nile tilapia (<i>Oreochromis niloticus</i>)". </b>Furthermore, supplemental figures are avaliable <b>(</b><b>https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400116).</b><b><br></b><b><br></b><b>Figure S1.</b> Correlations between observed and imputed genotypes for each SNP for imputation from low-density (LD3K) to high-density (HD) panel in Nile tilapia using parents (n = 108) and 20% of offspring (n = 226) genotyped with the HD panel as the reference set and 80% of offspring (n = 904) as the validation set. The black line indicates the mean imputation accuracy. <b>Figure S2.</b> Correlations between observed and imputed genotypes for each SNP for imputation from low-density (LD1K) to high-density (HD) in Nile tilapia using parents (n = 108) and 20% of the offspring (n = 226) genotyped with the HD panel as the reference set and 80% of the offspring (n = 904) as the validation set. The black line indicates the mean imputation accuracy. <b>Figure S3.</b> Correlations between observed and imputed genotypes for each SNP for imputation from low-density (LD0.5K) to high-density (HD) in Nile tilapia using parents (n = 108) and 20% of offspring (n = 226) genotyped with the HD panel as the reference set and 80% of the offspring (n = 904) as the validation set. The black line indicates the mean imputation accuracy. <b>Figure S4.</b> Genotyping cost reduction (%) compared to scenario A, where all animals are genotyped using a HD panel.<b></b>