TRAINING LOAD IMPACT ON RECOVERY STATUS IN PROFESSIONAL VOLLEYBALL ATHLETES

ABSTRACT Introduction: The success of training depends on the balance between training load magnitude and recovery. Objective: Verify the effect of training load distribution on recovery status, vigor and fatigue in volleyball players during a season. Methods: Nine male athletes from a professional volleyball team participated in the study. During 19 weeks of the season, quantification of the training load was performed through the session rating of perceived exertion (RPE) method, evaluation of the athletes' recovery status through the Total Quality Recovery (TQR) scale, and evaluation of the profile of mood state through the POMS questionnaire, with research focus for the subscales vigor and fatigue. Results: The average total weekly training load (TWTL) was 3206 ± 685.5 A. Us and the average recovery of the whole season was 15.3 ± 0.57. The mean values of fatigue and vigor were 11 ± 3.05 and 19.4 ± 2.84, respectively. Significant differences were found for the variables RPE, fatigue and Energy Index (Vigor - Fatigue) in the three different periods of the season (Preparatory Period, Competitive Period I and Competitive Period II). Conclusion: It was concluded that the training load and recovery monitoring methods used throughout the season were effective in controlling the variables, with a positive impact of training loads verified on the recovery values presented by the athletes. Level of Evidence III; Diagnostic study.摘要 引言：训练成效的优劣取决于训练负荷强度与恢复状态之间的平衡。 目的：探究赛季期间排球运动员的训练负荷分配对其恢复状态、活力水平与疲劳程度的影响。 方法：本研究纳入某职业排球队的9名男性运动员参与。在赛季的19周周期内，研究采用单次训练主观疲劳感知评分（session Rating of Perceived Exertion, RPE）法量化训练负荷，通过整体恢复质量（Total Quality Recovery, TQR）量表评估运动员的恢复状态，并借助情绪状态轮廓（Profile of Mood States, POMS）问卷评估情绪状态，重点关注其中的活力与疲劳两个分量表。 结果：平均每周总训练负荷（Total Weekly Training Load, TWTL）为3206±685.5任意单位，全赛季平均恢复得分为15.3±0.57；疲劳与活力的平均得分分别为11±3.05与19.4±2.84。在赛季的三个不同阶段（准备期、第一竞赛期与第二竞赛期）中，RPE、疲劳度与能量指数（活力-疲劳）这三个变量均存在显著差异。 结论：本研究得出结论：全赛季采用的训练负荷与恢复监测方法可有效管控上述变量，且训练负荷对运动员的恢复水平存在正向影响。 证据等级Ⅲ；诊断性研究。