Comparison between ISMA and ISMAGS on the Slashdot and SNAP networks.

The reported parameters are analogously defined as in Table 6. Note that for the clique subgraphs, the SNAP networks are assumed to be undirected, while for the tetrahedron, they are assumed to be dir

NIAID Data Ecosystem40

Comparison between ISMA and ISMAGS on the biological networks.

The reported #instances is the number of subgraph instances as exported by ISMAGS. The search space size is the #nodes visited during the search process. SPRF is the search space reduction factor and

NIAID Data Ecosystem40

Comparison between ISMAGS, VF2, GK and G-Trie on the SNAP networks.

Similar to Table 8, the top row denotes, for each algorithm, the number of runs averaged to obtain the reported timing results. However, the result denoted with a circle was averaged over 10 runs.

NIAID Data Ecosystem10