Dataset for: Open Science and public trust in science: Results from two studies. Public Understanding of Science
收藏PsychArchives2022-04-26 更新2026-04-25 收录
下载链接:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/5885
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Abstract of the original article, published in Public Understanding of Science: In two studies, we examined whether open science practices, such as making the materials, data, and code of a study openly accessible, positively affect public trust in science. Furthermore, we investigated whether the potential trust-damaging effects of research being funded privately (e.g., by a commercial enterprise) may be buffered by such practices. After preregistering six hypotheses, we conducted a survey study (Study 1; N = 504) and an experimental study (Study 2; N = 588) in two German general population samples. In both studies, we found evidence for the positive effects of open science practices on trust, though it should be noted that in Study 2, results were more inconsistent. We however did not find evidence for the aforementioned buffering effect. We conclude that while open science practices may contribute to increasing trust in science, the importance of making the use of open science practices visible should not be underestimated. Dataset for: Rosman, T., Bosnjak, M., Silber, H., Koßmann, J., & Heycke, T. (2022). Open science and public trust in science: Results from two studies. Public Understanding of Science, 31(8), 1046–1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221100686 unknown
提供机构:
PsychArchives
创建时间:
2022-04-26



