Dataset for "Assessing the cultural heritage of historical ferries: A case study from the Czech Republic"

Fig. 2: The ferry grounds on the Morava and Dyje rivers, with both the cultural-historical values relating to the individual types and theoverall cultural-historical value – sorted by river flow (Notes: A – typology value; B – technological flow value; C – system links value; D –authenticity value; E – architectural value; F – art historical value; G – landscape value; H – historical value; I – age value; total – completeart historical value of the area)Source: Authors’ elaboration Fig. 6: The Labe River ferry sites, with both the cultural-historical values relating to the individual types and the overall cultural-historicalvalue (Notes: A – typology value; B – technological flow value; C – system links value; D – authenticity value; E – architectural value; F – arthistorical value; G – landscape value; H – historical value; I – age value /continuity; total – complete art historical value of the area)Source: Authors’ elaboration Tab. 1: Statistics of individual categories of values – Morava and Dyje rivers (n = 17; Notes: A – typology value; B – technological flow value;C – system links value; D – authenticity value; E – architectural value; F – art historical value; G – landscape value; H – historical value; I – agevalue /continuity; total – complete art historical value of the area)Source: Authors’ research and calculations Tab. 2: Statistics of individual categories of values – Labe River (n = 48; Notes: A – typology value; B – technological flow value; C – systemlinks value; D – authenticity value; E – architectural value; F – art historical value; G – landscape value; H – historical value; I – age value /continuity; total – complete art historical value of the area)Source: Authors’ research and calculations