MOESM2 of LRScaf: improving draft genomes using long noisy reads

Additional file 2: Tables S1-S9. Tables S1–S9 for this study: 1) Table S1. The performances for E. coli and S. cerevisiae based on draft assemblies generated by SOAPdenovo2 and SPAdes using 1, 5, 10, and 20 -fold coverages of PacBio long reads; 2) Table S2. The performances for E. coli and S. cerevisiae based on draft assemblies referred to LINKS on Nanopore long reads; 3) Table S3. The performances of scaffolders tested for H. sapiens using 1, 5, 15, and 35 -fold coverages of Nanopore long reads; 4) Table S4. The performances of all scaffolders tested on different median read lengths (9, 18, and 26 kbp) of 10-fold coverage using PacBio long reads for E. coli; 5) Table S5. The performances of CANU and LRScaf (minimap2) for E. coli on 5, 10, 20, and 30 -fold coverages using Nanopore long reads; 6) Table S6. The performances for scaffolder tested on DISCOVAR, MaSuRCA, Platanus, SOAPDenovo2, and SparseAssembler on A. thaliana, O. sativa, S. pennellii, Z. mays, and H. sapiens; 7) Table S7. The BUSCO measurements for scaffolder tested on DISCOVAR, MaSuRCA, Platanus, SOAPDenovo2, and SparseAssembler on A. thaliana, O. sativa, S. pennellii, Z. mays, and H. sapiens; 8) Table S8. The parameter settings of LRScaf on E. coli, S. cerevisiae, A. thaliana, O. sativa, S. pennellii, Z. mays, and H. sapiens; and 9) Table S9. The performances for DBG2OLC and LRScaf on E. coli and A. thaliana.