A network anaylsis of Doyle & Endress (2018) matrix

This submission includes the data for the following post on the <i>Genealogical World of Phylogenetic Networks </i>entitled:<br><i><b>Want to place a fossil in a minute? Just use neighbour-nets</b></i>https://phylonetworks.blogspot.com/2018/06/want-to-place-fossil-in-minute-just-use.html<br>It includes the graphics shown in the post and a 7z-archive with the following content: <b>Splits-NEXUS-formatted raw neighbour-net files</b>, which include the used distance matrices (*.dist).DE18.mean.dist — the all-inclusive graph (and distance matrix)<br>DE18.FG.VS.dist — a graph reduced to the focus group (fossils + Chloranthales + <i>Ceratophyllum </i>+ <i>Amborella</i>) and using a distance matrix as input generated by excluding all invariable ("constant") characters within the focus group<br><br><b>Ready-to-use NEXUS-formatted versions of Doyle &amp; Endress' 2010 </b><b>and 2018 matrices</b> – files labelled as DE10.simple.nex and DE18.simple.nex.<br><br><b>Important citation note: </b>Make sure that when you re-use these data to cite not only this <i>figshare </i>fileset but also the original papers<br><b>Doyle JA, Endress PK. 2010</b>. Integrating Early Cretaceous fossils into the phylogeny of living angiosperms: Magnoliidae and eudicots.<i> Journal of Systematics and Evolution</i> 48:1–35.<br><b>Doyle JA, Endress PK. 2018.</b> Phylogenetic analyses of Cretaceous fossils related to Chloranthaceae and their evolutionary implications. <i>Botanical Review</i> DOI:10.1007/s12229-018-9197-6.<br>