The collection of narratives on strategies, ethics and public response of COVID-19 national vaccination process written by members of scholarly association Navigating Knowledge Landscapes Network

The data collected in this dataset are narratives exploring public policies, attitudes, individual behaviors, and the collective experiences of the involved communities regarding vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The narratives were written by the members of the interdisciplinary research network Navigating Knowledge Landscapes (NKL; http://knowledge-landscapes.hiim.hr/). The members of the network are scholars belonging to different research disciplines and the aim of the network is to explore and discuss the individual aspects of citizens’ navigation of (new) knowledge in the digital society.
An invitation to participate in this study was sent to members of the network on May 5, 2021. First responses were received on May 13, 2021, while the last response (including updated versions) was received on July 21, 2021. In total, 25 contributions were received from 27 scholars representing 17 countries (some scholars co-authored their contributions). Each of them described strategies, ethics, and public response of COVID-19 national vaccination process in their country.
The scholars are coming from different academic background, but most of them are experts in Life Sciences, Sociology, Philosophy and Medicine.
The participants were asked to answer the following questions in their narratives by maximum 200-300 words per question:

Part 1: The national vaccination program
Describe the COVID-19 vaccination in your country: what were its strengths, main weaknesses, opportunities to improve it and threats to its success?
Part 2: Public discourse and ethics
How would you describe public responses to your country’s vaccination program? What is your impression on the various collective attitudes towards the vaccination program in your country? Were there any ethical issues or concerns around the vaccine program in your country?
Part 3: Personal experience
What is your personal experience, opinion or attitude regarding COVID-19 vaccination?
No corrections or modifications were applied to the narratives, including no proofreading or
grammatical checks. The authors agreed that their narratives can be published under their full
name and affiliation, and the resulting collection used for research purposes. Ethical approval
for this study was obtained from The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.

本数据集收录了在COVID-19疫情期间，关于疫苗接种的公共政策、公众态度、个体行为以及相关社区集体经历的叙述。这些叙述由跨学科研究网络“知识景观导航”（Navigating Knowledge Landscapes，简称NKL；http://knowledge-landscapes.hiim.hr/）的成员撰写。该网络汇聚了来自不同研究领域的学者，旨在探讨和讨论公民在数字化社会中导航（新）知识的个体层面。2021年5月5日，向网络成员发出了参与研究的邀请，首批回应于5月13日收到，而最后的回应（包括更新版本）则于7月21日收到。总计收到了来自17个国家的27位学者的25篇贡献（部分学者共同撰写了他们的贡献）。每位学者都描述了他们在各自国家COVID-19国家疫苗接种过程中的策略、伦理以及公众反应。

这些学者来自不同的学术背景，但其中大多数是生命科学、社会学、哲学和医学的专家。

参与者被要求在其叙述中回答以下问题，每个问题的字数不超过200-300字：

第一部分：国家疫苗接种计划
描述您国家COVID-19疫苗接种的情况：其优势、主要弱点、改进的机会以及成功面临的威胁。

第二部分：公共话语与伦理
您将如何描述您国家疫苗接种计划的公众反应？您对您国家关于疫苗接种计划的各类集体态度有何印象？您国家在疫苗接种计划中是否存在任何伦理问题或担忧？

第三部分：个人经历
您对COVID-19疫苗接种的个人经历、观点或态度是什么？

对叙述未进行任何修改或校正，包括未进行校对或语法检查。作者同意以全名及其所属机构发表他们的叙述，并将由此产生的集合用于研究目的。该研究的伦理批准已获得苏格兰爱丁堡大学。”
}