sim_results.tar.xz

This document contains simulation results of the preprint article titled "Impact of 2019 Mw 5.8 Marmara Sea Earthquake on the Seismic Cycle of Locked North Anatolian Fault Segment" to GRL. <br> QD and QS-FD denote the simulation strategies quasi-dynamic and quasi-static&amp;full-dynamic <br> Inside each of these folders (strategies), there are four folders corresponds to the different state laws (Dieterich, 1979; Ruina, 1983; Perrin et al., 1995; Nagata et al., 2012). In the study, we assume the shear stress of the firctional interface obeys rate-and-state friction. <br> Inside the folders defining state laws two folders appear. They denote which fault analogy do they belong (SET1 and SET2). For explanation see the manuscript. <br> In each foder, the natural runs (untriggered simulations) begin with "unperturbed". The folders whose names begin with "triggered" correspond to results of earthquake triggering. <br> H. Dieterich, “Modeling of rock friction 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 84, no. B5,pp. 2161–2168, 1979.<br> A. Ruina, “Slip instability and state variable friction laws.,” Journal of Geophys-ical Research, vol. 88, no. B12, pp. 10359–10370, 1983.<br> G. Perrin, J. R. Rice, and G. Zheng, “Self-healing slip pulse on a frictional sur- face,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1461–1495, 1995.<br> K. Nagata, M. Nakatani, and S. Yoshida, “A revised rate-and state-dependent friction law obtained by constraining constitutive and evolution laws separately with laboratory data,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 117, no. B2, 2012