Making the Invisible Visible: Does the Depth-Psychological Unconscious Pose a Problem to First-Person-Perspective Methods in Psychology Wie man das Unsichtbare sichtbar macht: Stellt das tiefenpsychologische Unbewusste ein Problem für die Erste-Person-Perspektive-Methoden in der Psychologie dar?

Advocates of first-person-perspective-methods (FPPM) claim that any psychological concept must be grounded in a descriptive analysis (first-person-foundationalism). It is often assumed that the concept of the unconscious is incompatible with FPPM, and that its acceptance implies the rejection of first-person-foundationalism. This view is based on the following assumption: either FPPM are generally incapable of engaging with the unconscious, or FPPM are incapable of accounting for the systematic independence of the unconscious. It is the aim of this paper to show that this assumption is wrong. I argue that a) phenomenology has access to the unconscious, b) phenomenology can account for the systematic independence of the unconscious, and c) accepting the concept of the unconscious does imply the rejection of first-person-foundationalism. peerReviewed publishedVersion