five

How to make methodological decisions when inferring social networks

收藏
NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-12 收录
下载链接:
http://datadryad.org/dataset/doi%253A10.5061%252Fdryad.p8cz8w9mx
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
更多采购需求
资源简介:
Social network analyses allow studying the processes underlying the associations between individuals and the consequences of those associations. Constructing and analysing social networks can be challenging, especially when designing new studies as researchers are confronted with decisions about how to collect data and construct networks, and the answers are not always straightforward. The current lack of guidance on building a social network for a new study system might lead researchers to try several different methods, and risk generating false results arising from multiple hypotheses testing. Here, we suggest an approach for making decisions when starting social network research in a new study system that avoids the pitfall of multiple hypotheses testing. We argue that best edge definition for a network is a decision that can be made using a priori knowledge about the species, and that is independent from the hypotheses that the network will ultimately be used to evaluate. We illustrate this approach with a study conducted on a colonial cooperatively breeding bird, the sociable weaver. We first identified two ways of collecting data using different numbers of feeders and three ways to define associations among birds. We then evaluated which combination of data collection and association definition maximised (i) the assortment of individuals into previously known ‘breeding groups’ (birds that contribute towards the same nest and maintain cohesion when foraging), and (ii) socially differentiated relationships (more strong and weak relationships than expected by chance). This evaluation of different methods based on a priori knowledge of the study species can be implemented in a diverse array of study systems and makes the case for using existing, biologically meaningful knowledge about a system to help navigate the myriad of methodological decisions about data collection and network inference. Methods The dataset was collected from a population of sociable weavers at Benfontein Nature Reserve, situated ca. 6 km south-east of Kimberley, in the Northern Cape Province, South Africa. We used artificial feeding stations and RFID technology to collect social network data.
创建时间:
2021-01-16

社区讨论

【我遇到的问题】 • 现象:该数据集的下载链接已失效 【相关信息】 • 可考虑访问这个链接获取类似文件~https://www.selectdataset.com/dataset/3688356173feccbcf1f1e490ddc6bc72

5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作