Supplemental Information for MMETSP article: 'Re-assembly, quality evaluation, and annotation of 678 microbial eukaryotic reference transcriptomes'

Supplemental Information for the MMETSP article, 'Re-assembly, quality evaluation, and annotation of 678 microbial eukaryotic reference transcriptomes'<br><b>Supplemental Table 1:</b> All evaluation metrics collected for Johnson et al. 2018 (MMETSP_all_evaluation_matrix.csv)<b>Supplemental Table 2:</b> Metadata for Supplemental Table 1 (MMETSP_all_evaluation_matrix_METADATA.csv)<b>Supplemental Notebook 1:</b> comparison between NCBI SRA and iMicrobe sample information (.ipynb)<b>Supplemental Notebook 2:</b> Trinity version comparisons (.ipynb)<b>Supplemental Figure 1:</b> Transrate score comparisons between DIB re-assemblies and the two 'cds' and 'nt' versions of the NCGR assemblies (.pdf)<b>Supplemental Figure 2:</b> Frequency distribution of differences between Transrate scores between the NCGR ‘nt’ assemblies and the DIB re-assemblies grouped by the top seven most represented phyla in the MMETSP data set (.pdf)<b>Supplemental Figure 3:</b> The mean proportion of contigs with complete protistan universal single copy orthologs (BUSCO) recovered in each assembly (.pdf)<b>Supplemental Figure 4:</b> A subset of MMETSP samples. (.pdf and .ipynb)<br>Other notebooks used to generate Figures for Johnson et al 2018:<br>Johnson_etal_2018_GigaScience_Figures.ipynbFigures 4 and 7 - MMETSP_unique_kmers_dammitgenenames.ipynbFigure8_aov.ipynbMMETSP_transcriptome_assembly_stats.ipynbmake_large_assembly_evaluation_matrix.ipynb<br>Files located on GitHub:https://github.com/ljcohen/MMETSP