five

Ability of Nafamostat Mesilate to Prolong Filter Patency during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients at High Risk of Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Study

收藏
NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-09 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Ability_of_Nafamostat_Mesilate_to_Prolong_Filter_Patency_during_Continuous_Renal_Replacement_Therapy_in_Patients_at_High_Risk_of_Bleeding_A_Randomized_Controlled_Study_/1200640
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is considered as an effective modality for renal replacement therapy in hemodynamically unstable patients within intensive care units (ICUs). However, the role of heparin anticoagulation, which is used to maintain circuit patency, is equivocal due to the risk of bleeding and morbidity. Among various alternative anticoagulants, nafamostat mesilate has been shown to be an effective anticoagulant in patients prone to bleeding. Hence, we conducted a prospective, randomized controlled study investigating the effect of nafamostat mesilate on mortality, CRRT filter life span and adverse events in patients with bleeding tendency. Seventy-three Patients were randomized into either the futhan or no-anticoagulation group. Thirty-six subjects in the futhan group received nafamostat mesilate, while thirty seven subjects in the no-anticoagulation group received no anticoagulants. Baseline characteristics and appropriate laboratory tests were taken from each group. The mortality between the two groups was not significantly different. Nevertheless, between the futhan group and the no-anticoagulation group, the overall number of filters used during CRRT (2.71±2.12 vs. 4.50±3.25; p = 0.042) and the number of filters changed due to clots per 24 hours (1.15±0.81 vs. 1.74±1.62; p = 0.040) were significantly different. When filter life span was subdivided into below and over 12 hours, the number of filters functioning over 12 hours was significantly higher in the futhan group than in the no-anticoagulation group (p = 0.037, odds ratio 1.84). There were no significant differences in transfusion, mortality, or survival between the two groups, and no adverse events related to nafamostat mesilate were noted. Hence, nafamostat mesilate may be used as an effective and safe anticoagulant, without increasing the risk of major bleeding complications, in patients prone to bleeding. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01761994
创建时间:
2014-10-10
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务