five

A novel generalized spatial mark-resight model that accounts for group associations

收藏
DataCite Commons2026-03-12 更新2026-04-25 收录
下载链接:
https://datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.7d7wm387j
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
The number and distribution of animals in space form the basis of many wildlife studies. Yet, reliable estimation of population abundance remains challenging. Generalized spatial mark-resight (gSMR) models are widely applicable abundance estimators that do not require all individuals be uniquely identifiable. Despite their flexibility, gSMR models assume independence in distribution and detections of individuals throughout space. Group-living species that aggregate (i.e., share activity centers) and move cohesively (i.e., share detections) violate these assumptions, limiting the applicability of gSMR models to solitary species with limited home range overlap. We developed a gSMR model that accounts for group associations to estimate spatial abundance. We treated groups as the measurable “units” and included a submodel that uses Poisson processes to estimate group size. We conducted a simulation study to compare our novel group-based gSMR to a gSMR that ignores group associations. We generated data across varying levels of aggregation and cohesion parameters. We then quantified and compared precision and bias of parameter estimates between the two models. The group-based gSMR model outperformed the individual-based gSMR under all aggregation and cohesion scenarios. Group-based 95% Bayesian Credible Intervals (BCI) overlapped the true value of abundance in 91% of simulations, compared to only 10% of simulations in the individual-based gSMR. Both the group-based and individual-based models became less precise and more biased as aggregation and group-size increased. However, the group-based gSMR model was less biased in estimating all parameters when compared to the individual-based gSMR model. We applied our group-based gSMR model to grey wolf (Canis lupus) monitoring data within a Canadian national park complex (Banff, Yoho, and Kootenay National Parks, and Ya Ha Tinda). We used 12 years (2012-2023) of remote camera data, along with information from GPS radio-collared wolves (N = 16) to estimate spatiotemporal variation in abundance. Over a 12-year period wolf abundance averaged 73 (95% BCI = 20 – 207) individuals, and a density of 6.69 (95% BCI = 1.83 – 19.0) wolves per 1,000 km2 within the park complex. Our novel group-based gSMR model extends the applicability of spatial mark-resight to species with group associations.
提供机构:
Dryad
创建时间:
2026-02-05
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作