Table 6. Significant p in Integrative taxonomy delimits and diagnoses cryptic arboreal species of the Cyrtodactylus brevipalmatus group (Squamata, Gekkonidae) with descriptions of four new species from Thailand

Table 6. Significant p -values from the results of the ANOVA analyses comparing all combinations of OTU pairs of the Cyrtodactylus brevipalmatus group. SVL and TL4U are not listed because no species pairs differed significantly from one another. * = Results based on a Games-Howell post hoc test. Character abbreviations are listed in the Materials and methods.
Morphometric charactersAG *HumL *ForLFemLTibLHLHWHD *ED *EE *ESEN *IOELINCyrtodactylus fluvicavus sp. nov. vs. C. brevipalmatus0.000.01<0.0010.0010.048<0.0010.0040.0020.004C. interdigitalis vs. C. brevipalmatus0.000.000.00<0.001C. ngati vs. C. brevipalmatus0.000.0030.001<0.001C. ngati 3 vs. C. brevipalmatus0.0140.030.01<0.0010.0080.038<0.0010.0040.000C. rukhadeva vs. C. brevipalmatus<0.0010.0010.022<0.0010.021C. sp.9 vs. C. brevipalmatus0.01<0.001<0.0010.03C. interdigitalis vs. Cyrtodactylus fluvicavus sp. nov.0.01C. ngati vs. Cyrtodactylus fluvicavus sp. nov.<0.0010.0020.04<0.0010.005<0.001<0.001C. ngati 3 vs. Cyrtodactylus fluvicavus sp. nov.<0.0010.0250.038C. rukhadeva vs. Cyrtodactylus fluvicavus sp. nov.0.049<0.001<0.0010.004C. sp.9 vs. Cyrtodactylus fluvicavus sp. nov.0.00.0070.0130.0230.007C. ngati vs. C. interdigitalis0.0070.0310.010<0.0010.000C. ngati 3 vs. C. interdigitalis0.0110.003C. rukhadeva vs. C. interdigitalis0.00.010.000.044C. sp.9 vs. C. interdigitalis0.000.007C. ngati 3 vs. C. ngati<0.0010.0190.006<0.0010.001C. rukhadeva vs. C. ngati0.003<0.001<0.0010.046<0.0010.001<0.001<0.0010.001C. sp.9 vs. C. ngati<0.001<0.0010.0420.007<0.001<0.0010.000C. rukhadeva vs. C. ngati 3<0.0010.0210.00.000.0070.020.006C. sp.9 vs. C. ngati 30.0010.010.030.0030.0430.0010.0190.0190.003C. sp.9 vs. C. rukhadeva0.020.0040.020.033Meristic charactersSLIL *PVT *LRTVSVSMTL4ETL4TFL4EFL4U *FL4T *FSPCS *BB *Cyrtodactylus fluvicavus sp. nov. vs. C. brevipalmatus0.037<0.0010.05C. interdigitalis vs C. brevipalmatus<0.0010.0000.0020.044C. ngati vs C. brevipalmatus<0.0010.028<0.001C. ngati 3 vs C. brevipalmatus0.0170.029C. rukhadeva vs C. brevipalmatus<0.001<0.001C. sp.9 vs C. brevipalmatus<0.0010.0030.022<0.0010.05C. interdigitalis vs Cyrtodactylus fluvicavus sp. nov.0.0000.0000.021<0.0010.000<0.001C. ngati vs Cyrtodactylus fluvicavus sp. nov.0.0370.002<0.001<0.0010.0330.0000.002<0.001C. ngati 3 vs Cyrtodactylus fluvicavus sp. nov.0.005C. rukhadeva vs Cyrtodactylus fluvicavus sp. nov.0.0000.0010.001C. sp.9 vs Cyrtodactylus fluvicavus sp. nov.<0.001<0.0010.0010.0040.020C. ngati vs C. interdigitalis0.0010.029<0.001<0.0010.029C. ngati 3 vs C. interdigitalis0.0290.0250.005C. rukhadeva vs C. interdigitalis0.0040.0110.0010.0440.0010.002C. sp.9 vs C. interdigitalis0.003<0.0010.0050.0430.01<0.001C. ngati 3 vs C. ngati0.02670.001<0.001C. rukhadeva vs C. ngati<0.001<0.0010.008<0.0010.0080.03<0.001C. sp.9 vs C. ngati0.0030.0160.0110.000<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001C. rukhadeva vs C. ngati 3C. sp.9 vs C. ngati 30.0010.042<0.0010.001C. sp.9 vs C. rukhadeva0.029<0.0010.0020.001