Dataset for Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group review updates priority-setting exercise

Objective: To engage in a priority-setting exercise with both clinicians and consumers to determine systematic reviews of highest priority to update. Study Design & Setting: The US Satellite of the Cochrane Pregnancy & Childbirth Group (US-PCG) narrowed a list of over 600 review titles due for updating down to 97 review titles based on US relevance. The US-PCG then used the Delphi method to explore consensus on which titles to prioritize for updating. In Round 1, participants self-identified as a clinician/researcher or consumer, and then ranked titles into “high”, “medium”, and “low” priority groups. In Round 2, participants were given Round 1 results and asked to rank their top 5 titles. Results were analyzed within and between groups.研究目标：本研究旨在联合临床医生与消费者开展优先级确定工作，以遴选出亟需更新的最高优先级系统综述。研究设计与场景：考克兰妊娠与分娩研究组（Cochrane Pregnancy & Childbirth Group, US-PCG）从600余篇待更新的综述标题中，筛选出97篇与美国相关的标题。随后，该团队采用德尔菲法（Delphi method）就需优先更新的综述标题达成共识。第一轮调研阶段，参与者自行标注身份为临床医生/研究人员或消费者，并将所有综述标题划分为“高”“中”“低”三个优先级组别。第二轮调研阶段，参与者将获取第一轮调研结果，并需对其优先选择的5篇标题进行排序。研究对组内及组间的调研结果进行了分析。