Additional file 4 of Multi-omics integration for neuroblastoma clinical endpoint prediction

Tables S5–S8. The tables highlight the cases in which INF performs similarly or better than both juxt and rSNF. Each sheet represents one classifier (sheet S5: RF; sheet S6: RF KBest; sheet S7: LSVM; sheet S8: LSVM KBest). The information is coded as follows. Bold: INF performs better than both juxt and rSNF in terms of MCC CV, MCC val and Nfeat. Black (not bold): MCC INF − MCC juxt < 0.1 and MCC INF − MCC rSNF <0.1. Light gray: failed run or INF performs worse in either CV or validation. (XLSX 15.7 kb)