Zamboanga Home-Based Internally Displaced Persons Re-Profiling, 2016 - Philippines

Abstract
---------------------------

In April 2016, following a series of consultations between the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, the City Social Welfare and Development Office and other partners in Zamboanga, a profiling exercise for home-based internally displaced persons (IDPs) was conceptualized. The main purpose was to validate the relevance of existing lists and obtain up-to-date information from home-based IDPs who decided to take part in the exercise so that the government, as well as other humanitarian and development actors, can make informed and consultative decisions while designing and targeting their assistance programs, including protection interventions.

Following a piloting phase in June 2016, the full-blown profiling was conducted in July-August 2016 and reached 6,474 families from 66 barangays in Zamboanga. Of these, 1,135 families were assessed to be potential home-based IDPs based on the documents they presented. The profiling revealed that most home-based IDPs are living in barangays of Sta. Catalina, Sta. Barbara, Talon-Talon and Rio Hondo.

Geographic coverage
---------------------------

The profiling exercise was conducted in 66 barangays under the Seven (7) District Offices in Zamboanga City known to be hosting home-based IDPs. The current CSWDO master list and the results of profiling in December 2014, which made up the "consolidated master list", were used to help identify location of the IDPs.

Analysis unit
---------------------------

Households

Universe
---------------------------

All suspected households hosting IDPs.

Identification and verification of home-based IDPs during profiling were fully contingent on the presentation of following documentation by families approaching the profiling team: Family Access Cards (colored pink) issued by DSWD for home-based IDPs at the onset of the siege, Certification issued by CSWDO indicating the family as home-based IDPs, as well as National Housing Authority's (NHA) Tagging Form or Barangay Chairman endorsement provided that these two latter documents are presented together with a Family Access Card (colored pink) or CSWDO certification as home-based IDP.

Kind of data
---------------------------

Census/enumeration data [cen]

Sampling procedure
---------------------------

The current CSWDO master list and the results of profiling in December 2014, which made up the "consolidated master list", were used to help identify location of the IDPs. Based on this consolidated master list, a total of 4,372 families was used as baseline data. This home-based IDP profiling activity was able to reach 6,474 families from 66 barangays.

Mode of data collection
---------------------------

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument
---------------------------

Three data collection questionnaires, namely Forms A, B and C, were developed for this activity in anticipation of various respondent scenarios.
Form A was intended for home-based IDPs whose names were already included in the consolidated master list and who had consistently showed up in profiling exercises since December 2014. Form B was intended for respondents who were not in the consolidated master list but were able to provide the documentation outlined above, confirming them to be home-based IDP. Form C, on the other hand, was intended for respondents whose names were not found in the master list, as well as those home-based IDPs who were assessed to have returned, awardees of permanent housing projects, and those who otherwise did not qualify under Forms A or B as they were not able to present the required documentation.
Forms A & B

Cleaning operations
---------------------------

The collected datasets from the field were processed and analyzed in Microsoft Office Excel platform using Power Query and Power Pivot. Each form was processed separately before processing the combined results of all forms.

There were two types of analysis for this re-profiling activity in relation to the stated objectives. Firstly, the analysis focuses on assessing the validity of the current government master list of home-based IDPs. The second type of analysis is the comparative analysis of the current and previous profiling to evaluate the trend and patterns of movement, and assess the protection condition of home-based IDPs.

摘要
---------------------------
2016年4月，在联合国难民事务高级专员公署、城市社会福利与发展办公室及赞博角的合作伙伴之间的一系列磋商之后，一项针对居家流离失所者（IDP）的概况研究被构想出来。其主要目的是验证现有名单的相关性，并从决定参与此活动的居家流离失所者那里获取最新信息，以便政府及其他人道主义和发展参与者能够在设计和针对其援助计划，包括保护干预措施时，做出基于信息和协商的决策。

经过2016年6月的试点阶段，全面概况研究于7月至8月进行，覆盖了赞博角66个村庄的6,474个家庭。其中，根据他们提交的文件，评估出1,135个家庭具有成为潜在居家流离失所者的可能性。概况研究揭示了大多数居家流离失所者居住在斯塔·卡塔琳娜、斯塔·芭芭拉、塔隆-塔隆和里奥洪多等村庄。

地理覆盖范围
---------------------------
概况研究在赞博角城市七个（7）区办公室下，已知接待居家流离失所者的66个村庄进行。当前城市社会福利与发展办公室（CSWDO）主名单和2014年12月概况研究的结果，构成了“综合主名单”，被用来帮助确定流离失所者的位置。

分析单位
---------------------------
家庭

总体
---------------------------
所有疑似接待流离失所者的家庭。

识别和验证概况研究期间的居家流离失所者，完全依赖于接近概况研究团队的家庭提交以下文件：DSWD（社会福利与发展部）为居家流离失所者签发的家庭访问卡（粉红色），认证由CSWDO签发，表明该家庭为居家流离失所者，以及国家住房管理局（NHA）的标记表格或村庄主席的推荐信，前提是这两份文件与家庭访问卡（粉红色）或CSWDO的认证作为居家流离失所者一同提交。

数据类型
---------------------------
人口普查/枚举数据 [cen]

抽样程序
---------------------------
当前CSWDO主名单和2014年12月概况研究的结果，构成了“综合主名单”，被用来帮助确定流离失所者的位置。基于此综合主名单，共使用了4,372个家庭作为基线数据。此次居家流离失所者概况研究能够覆盖66个村庄的6,474个家庭。

数据收集方式
---------------------------
面对面 [f2f]

研究工具
---------------------------
为此活动开发了三种数据收集问卷，即A、B和C表，以应对各种受访者场景。
A表旨在针对那些姓名已包含在综合主名单中，并且自2014年12月以来一直参与概况研究的居家流离失所者。
B表旨在针对那些不在综合主名单中，但能够提供上述文件，以确认他们为居家流离失所者的受访者。
C表则针对那些姓名未出现在主名单中，以及那些评估为已返回、永久住房项目获奖者，以及其他不符合A或B表条件，因为他们无法提供所需文件的家庭。
A & B表

数据清理操作
---------------------------
从现场收集的数据集在Microsoft Office Excel平台中使用Power Query和Power Pivot进行处理和分析。在处理所有表格的综合结果之前，每个表格都分别进行处理。

此次重新概况活动针对既定目标进行了两种类型的数据分析。首先，分析集中于评估当前政府居家流离失所者主名单的有效性。第二种类型的数据分析是对当前和之前概况研究的比较分析，以评估流动趋势和模式，并评估居家流离失所者的保护状况。