Untitled Item

Within the field of periodontal therapy, the incidence of marginal gingival recession is a well-known finding that highlights the significance of adopting clinically sound root coverage strategies for successful treatment plans. Among these methods, Iwano Y.'s 2013 introduction of the Bidirectionally Positioned Flap (BPF) offers a unique strategy that merits further study. Thus the present study aims to evaluate the clinical results of BPF versus the conventional Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) for treating isolated gingival recessions that fit into Miller's Class I category. For this six-month clinical study, sixteen patients with a mean age of 41.8 years demonstrating such recessions were included in the study. Throughout the study, a number of clinical parameters were carefully documented, including the plaque index (PI), gingival thickness (GT), recession height (RH), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized tissue height (KTH), recession height (RH), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Six months later, both treatment methods showed considerable root coverage (P < 0.01), with an average coverage of 2.5 mm for the BPF group and 2.38 mm for the CAF group. Remarkably, there was no discernible statistically significant variation in the relative loss in height among the two treatments. In addition, there were no statistically significant differences in the assessments of gingival thickness (GT), probing depth (PD), keratinized tissue height (KTH), and clinical attachment level (CAL) between the treatment groups. The results of this investigation highlight the effectiveness of BPF and CAF in improving root coverage for a six-month duration, with BPF showing promise as a treatment for isolated gingival recession.