Alonmarom/us-college-basketball-expenses
收藏Hugging Face2025-11-15 更新2025-12-20 收录
下载链接:
https://hf-mirror.com/datasets/Alonmarom/us-college-basketball-expenses
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
# US Collegiate Basketball Expenses Analysis – EDA Project
This project explores historical athletic spending data from U.S. colleges and universities.
The goal was to analyze spending trends and disparities in men's and women's basketball programs across different collegiate divisions.
## Dataset Overview
**Source:** U.S. Department of Education / IPEDS / Kaggle
**Size:** 132,327 entries (Filtered subset for Basketball: 8,443 rows).
**Target Variables:** `exp_men` and `exp_women` (Basketball Expenses).
## Data Cleaning & Preparation
- **Missing Values:** NaN values in all financial columns (e.g., expenses, revenue) were imputed with **zero (0)**.
- **Filtering:** The dataset was strictly filtered to include only "Basketball" entries.
- **Outliers:** **Retained** (Not removed), as extreme spending values belong to top-tier NCAA Division I programs and are critical for trend projection.
## Descriptive Statistics
**Gender Disparity:** Average spending for Men's Basketball ($0.92M$) is more than double that of Women's Basketball ($0.43M$).
**Skewness:** The Mean is significantly higher than the Median (e.g., Men's Median is $0.13M$), indicating that a few high-resource programs drive the overall average.
**Correlation:** Extremely high correlation (**0.99**) between Expenses and Revenue, indicating high spending is tied directly to high revenue generation.
## Research Questions
**Q1: What is the historical trend and projection for expenses?**
→ Strong, consistent **upward trend** for both genders (2003–2018), projecting continued spending escalation.

**Q2: Which divisional classification drives the highest expenses?**
→ **NCAA Division I-FBS** and **Division I without football** account for the highest expenditures and the largest gender spending gap.

**Q3: Is the gender spending gap consistent across divisions?**
→ Yes — the financial disparity (Men > Women) is **persistent across all divisions** (NCAA I, II, and III).

## Conclusion
The EDA confirms that **Institutional Classification** and **Revenue Generation** are the strongest factors influencing basketball spending.
Future spending is projected to increase sharply, and the significant **gender disparity** observed across all divisions is expected to persist.
## 4. Video Presentation
A short video presentation summarizing the EDA findings and conclusions:
[Watch the full Project Video Summary on YouTube](https://youtu.be/BBmzhtDYkiw)
提供机构:
Alonmarom



