five

Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale for studies meeting inclusion criteria.

收藏
Figshare2015-12-02 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Newcastle_Ottawa_quality_assessment_scale_for_studies_meeting_inclusion_criteria_/274090
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
A score of 0 indicates “no”; a score of 1 or 2 indicates “yes”. Studies scoring ≥67% were considered high methodological quality, 34%–66% were considered moderate methodological quality, and ≤33% were considered low methodological quality. Given that the distribution of possible confounders in randomised controlled trials is related to chance alone, randomised controlled trials were not assessed for confounding.ART, antiretroviral therapy; BMI, body mass index; NA, not applicable.
创建时间:
2015-12-02
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务