Anonymized_Anchor_Data.

BackgroundBiomechanical studies showed that increasing number of anchors could improve the repair strength of the repaired cuff at time zero.PurposeThe aim of this study was to determine if utilizing only a single anchor for a cuff tear repair is sufficient or otherwise to give a similar retear rate and clinical outcome as multiple anchors in a matched group of patients.Study designCohort study; Level of evidence, 3.MethodsRetrospective analysis of 346 matched consecutive patients (single anchor group, n = 173; multiple anchors group, n = 173) who had cuff tears ≤ 3*3 cm² (mediolateral * anteroposterior diameters) repaired by a single senior surgeon. Ultrasound was used to evaluate the integrity of repair 6 months post-surgery. Patient and surgeon reported outcomes were used to evaluate the clinical outcome of the method used for repair.Results6 months post-surgery; the retear rate for cuff tears ≤ 1*1 cm², tears ≤ 1 cm in mediolateral diameter and > 1 cm in anteroposterior diameter and tears > 1 cm in mediolateral diameter and ≤ 1 cm in anteroposterior diameter was similar in single and multiple anchors groups (4.8%) (3.3%) (P = 1.00), (10.8%) (7.9%) (P = 0.71) and (0%) (0%) respectively. Retear rate for cuff tears > 1*1 cm² was significantly higher in single anchor group (25.4%) compared to multiple anchors groups (10.9%) (P Conclusion6-months post-surgery; there was no significant difference in retear rate or clinical outcome between patients with tears ≤ 3*3 cm² (mediolateral * anteroposterior diameters) who had their cuff tears repaired using a single anchor compared to those who had their cuff tears repaired using multiple anchors unless both the mediolateral and anteroposterior diameters of the tear were > 1 cm, for which the utilization of multiple anchors showed a significantly lower retear rate at 6 months post-surgery. Operative time was significantly shorter only when a single anchor was used for repair of tears ≤ 1*1 cm².