Dataset for All Life Journal

The research set out to determine the effect of the prophylactic and curative spray of the synthetic defense inducers on the tomato plant infected with Clavibacter michiganensis subsp michiganensis (Cmm), done at the Department of Plant Pathology, G B Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India. In doing so, the tomato plants were artificially inoculated with Cmm, in two sets of plants receiving the treatment of SA, INA, BTH and lysozyme at the concentration of 200µM, 500µM and 800µM along with the positive and negative control, wherein one set of plants were treated before the pathogen inoculation and other was treated after the pathogen inoculation. The effect of defense inducers on plant was assessed through the enzymatic activity of PO (Table A and fig1), phenyl propanoid synthesis (Table B , Fig.2 and Table C, Fig.3), PPO ( Table D, Fig.4), β-1,3 glucanase (PR2) (Table E, Fig.5), hydrogen peroxide production in leaf tissues (Fig.6a-f) and lignin deposition in stem section (Fig.7a-f). In comparing all the treatments it was observed that the prophylactic treatment is more efficient than the curative treatment (Table1) in imparting resistance to the tomato plants against the invading pathogen. These Figures and Tables are present in the attached file titled "ALJ dataset. docx".本研究旨在明确合成防御诱导剂的预防性喷施与治疗性喷施，对感染密执安棒杆菌密执安亚种（Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, Cmm）的番茄植株的防控效应，试验由印度GB潘特农业与技术大学植物病理学系开展。试验过程中，研究人员将番茄植株人工接种Cmm，并设置两类处理组：一组在病原菌接种前施用浓度分别为200μM、500μM、800μM的水杨酸（SA）、异烟酸（INA）、苯并噻二唑（BTH）与溶菌酶，另一组在病原菌接种后进行上述药剂处理，同时设置阳性对照与阴性对照。本研究通过过氧化物酶（PO）活性（表A及图1）、苯丙烷类代谢产物合成（表B、图2与表C、图3）、多酚氧化酶（PPO）活性（表D、图4）、β-1,3-葡聚糖酶（PR2）活性（表E、图5）、叶片组织过氧化氢生成量（图6a-f）以及茎段木质素沉积情况（图7a-f），对防御诱导剂的植株防控效果进行评估。对比所有处理方案后可见，预防性施药在赋予番茄植株抵御入侵病原菌的抗性方面，其防控效率优于治疗性施药（表1）。本研究所涉及的图表与表格均收录于附件文件"ALJ dataset.docx"中。