Table 2 in Phylogeny and species delimitation in Albinaria from western Crete (Gastropoda: Clausiliidae)

Table 2. Isolation-by-distance tests of the primary species hypotheses (population numbers in parentheses).
Primary species hypothesesH 01H 02H 03Albinaria grabusana (1–4) vs. Albinaria tenuicostata (30–33)0.008<10−11/<10−8A. grabusana (1–4) vs. Albinaria xanthostoma (5–7)<10−12<10−14/<10−9A. grabusana (1–4) vs. Albinaria amalthea (8–13)0.025<10−16/<10−10A. xanthostoma (5–7) vs. A. amalthea (8–13)<10−13<10−6/<10−6A. amalthea (8–13) vs. Albinaria candida (14–16)<10−11<10−6/<10−17Albinaria amalthea unipalatalis (8–9) vs. A. a. amalthea + ssp. + bipalatalis (10–13)0.5800.205A. amalthea (8–13) vs. Albinaria byzantina (18–20)0.00310−3/10−7A. byzantina (18–20) vs. Albinaria eburnea (21–23)0.00610−4/0.244A. eburnea (21–23) vs. Albinaria sublamellosa (24–29)<10−3<10−9/<10−4
P -values were obtained for the hypothesis that the regressions of genetic on geographical distances within two primary species hypotheses agree (H 01). If this hypothesis could not be rejected,the hypothesis that the regression pattern between primary species hypotheses is compatible with the regression based on the combined within-group data was tested
(H). If H was rejected, the hypothesis that the regression pattern between groups is compatible with the regression within the primary species hypotheses was tested for each of 02 01 the primary species hypotheses separately (H 03).