Using data from nearly 5,000 votes cast by more than 400 judges in courts of last resort from all fifty states, we investigate whether there is a relationship between a state’s judicial retention meth

DataCite Commons2021-07-26 更新70

Replication Data for: Judges in the Lab: No Precedent Effects, No Common/Civil Law Differences

法律体系比较

法官决策

This data set contains the raw data, cleaning script, and analysis scripts to generate all figures and results in Spamann et al., "Judges in the Lab: No Precedent Effects, No Common/Civil Law Differen

NIAID Data Ecosystem60

Replication data for: Judging Statutes: Thoughts on Statutory Interpretation and Notes for a Project on the Internal Revenue Code

法官决策

税收法规解释

Why do judges interpret statutes the way they do? Positivist analyses aimed at answering this question abound and, perhaps not so surprisingly, have supplied no shortage of responses. Some suggest tha

NIAID Data Ecosystem70

Replication Data for: How Judicial Preferences Still Matter in a Majoritarian Court

执法行为分析

法官决策

These are the files necessary for replicating Kuriwaki, Shiro, and Albert Rivero, "How Judicial Preferences Still Matter in a Majoritarian Court." (working paper)

NIAID Data Ecosystem60

Replication Data for: Strategic Retirements of Elected and Appointed Justices: A Hazard Model Approach

资源简介：

相关数据集