Additional file 3 of Do current biomass equations for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens misestimate carbon stocks at peatland sites?

Additional file 3: Results of the Tukey-HSD test for biomass by site type: Additional file 3 displays the results of the Tukey test comparing the WAG results of equations which were parametrised for peatland or mineral plots for significant differences. The species for which the differences were tested is listed in “species”. Column “contrast” shows which site type was tested against which, where “yes” means the equation was parametrised for peatland, “no” means the equation was parametrised for forests on mineral soils and “partly”, refers to equations that were developed with data from mineral and peatland sites. The column “term” displays the variable the groups originate from, in this case the equations peat status (“peat”). Further, the table contains the difference in means (“diff”), the confidence levels (“conf.low”, “conf.high”), and the adjusted p-values (“adj.p.value”) for all possible pairs.