Table 3 in Molecular and morphological data suggest a new species of big-eared bat (Vespertilionidae: Corynorhinus) endemic to northeastern Mexico

Table 3. Shape variation explained by factors “Sex” nested in “Lineage”.
ModuleFactordfSSMSR 2FZ p-valueLateral basicraniumCS10.0030.0030.0273.7003.194 0.001 *Sex: lineage50.0090.0020.0932.5174.528 0.001 *Residuals1190.0830.0010.880Total1250.094LateralCS10.0050.0050.0374.9343.258 0.001 *RostrumSex: lineage50.0080.0020.0591.5671.751 0.045 *Residuals1190.1240.0010.903Total1250.137DorsalCS10.0010.0010.0658.6663.73 0.001 *BasicraniumSex: lineage50.0010.00020.0651.7311.97 0.028 *Residuals1160.0150.00010.870Total1220.018DorsalCS10.0410.0410.13420.284.867 0.001 *RostrumSex: lineage50.030.0060.0993.0082.888 0.004 *Residuals1160.2340.0020.767Total1220.305VentralCS10.0060.0060.0718.9445.382 0.001 *BasicraniumSex: lineage50.0030.0010.0390.9780.022 0.519Residuals1130.0780.0010.891Total1190.088VentralCS10.0110.0110.10614.2526.343 0.001 *RostrumSex: lineage50.0060.0010.0551.4751.75 0.04 *Residuals1130.0870.0010.839Total1190.104MandibleCS10.0020.0020.0273.3322.91 0.003 *Sex: lineage50.0050.0010.071.7132.192 0.018 *Residuals1100.0590.0010.902Total1160.065Regarding the CS comparison between lineages, in the dorsal view of the braincase, males of the SMO lineage presented lower CS compared to those of the TMVB lineage (d = 0.002, p = 0.01). For the dorsal view of the rostrum, only the females of the TMVB presented higher CS compared to those from the SMOC (d = 0.002, p = 0.01) and SMO (d = 0.001, p = 0.034). On the other hand, the CS of the ventral view of the rostrum was lower in males of the TMVB compared to the SMOC lineage (d = 0.003, p = 0.009). In the case of the mandible, only the SMO males presented a higher CS compared to the SMOC males (d = 0.51, p = 0.029). Modules, factors, and parameters obtained in the Procrustes ANOVA are shown. CS (centroid size). Significant P- values (<0.05) are indicated with *.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296275.t003