Citizen Safety and Security 2017

This survey charted Finnish views and opinions on safety and security in Finland. The study was conducted in 2017 by Suomen Kyselytutkimus in collaboration with the Finnish National Rescue Association (SPEK). First, some questions on the respondents' personal wellbeing and security were asked (e.g. whether they thought they would receive financial help from the people close to them if they needed it). The respondents' preparedness for different threats and disturbances was examined with questions regarding, for instance, how many days their household would fare without electricity, water, public transport, etc. Views on national security were also charted, and the respondents were asked how likely they considered Finland facing different problems within the next three years (e.g. threat of terrorism or sustained recession, problems with the supply of electricity, political problems, epidemics or pandemics, a massive influx of refugees, environmental catastrophes). Next, the respondents were presented with a set of attitudinal statements concerning the state's role in guaranteeing citizens' safety and livelihood, safety in different types of residential areas and in Finland more generally, the effect of technology on social relationships, the impact of media on safety, righteousness of the treatment of criminals and victims of crime, and trust in foreigners living in Finland. Feelings of unsafety were also charted, and the respondents were asked to what extent their feelings of safety were increased by different actors (e.g. the police, the Defence Forces, emergency services, healthcare services, family). The respondents' views on the biggest factors decreasing the safety of children and the elderly were surveyed (e.g. traffic, loneliness, crime, accidents, substance abuse). Finally, the respondents were asked how they thought the availability of various services, such as police or emergency services and public child day care, would change within the next three years. Background variables included the type of the respondent's municipality of residence, NUTS2 and NUTS3 regions of residence, statistical grouping of municipalities, and residence in the seven largest cities in Finland (categorised). Additionally, the background variables included the respondent's age and age group, gender, household composition, whether R's parents were born in Finland, highest level of education, economic activity and occupational status, and sufficiency of the household's income.

本调查描绘了芬兰民众对安全与保障的看法及观点。该研究由Suomen Kyselytutkimus机构于2017年联合芬兰国家救援协会（SPEK）共同实施。首先，调研者就受访者个人的福祉与安全相关问题进行了询问（例如，受访者是否认为在需要时能从亲近的人那里获得经济援助）。通过一系列问题，评估了受访者应对不同威胁与干扰的准备情况，例如，受访者家庭在没有电力、水源、公共交通等情况下能维持多少天。同时，调研还探讨了受访者对国家安全问题的看法，询问他们认为芬兰在未来三年内面临各种问题的可能性（例如，恐怖主义威胁、持续的衰退、电力供应问题、政治问题、流行病或大流行、大量难民涌入、环境灾难）。随后，受访者被呈现一系列关于国家在保障公民安全与生计、不同类型居住区域及芬兰整体安全、技术对社交关系的影响、媒体对安全的影响、犯罪者与受害者待遇的公正性，以及对外籍人士在芬兰居住的信任度的态度陈述。同时，还调查了受访者对不安全感的感觉，并询问不同行为者（例如，警察、军队、紧急服务、医疗服务、家庭）在何种程度上增强了他们的安全感。受访者还被调查认为哪些因素是降低儿童和老年人安全感的最大因素（例如，交通、孤独、犯罪、事故、药物滥用）。最后，受访者还被询问他们认为在接下来三年内，各种服务（如警察或紧急服务、公共儿童日托）的可获得性将如何变化。背景变量包括受访者居住市的类型、NUTS2和NUTS3居住区域、市政统计分组，以及居住在芬兰七个最大城市的情况（分类）。此外，背景变量还包括受访者的年龄及年龄段、性别、家庭构成、R的父母是否在芬兰出生、最高教育水平、经济活动及职业状况，以及家庭收入的充足程度。