Supporting Information S1 - MEG Correlates of Learning Novel Objects Properties in Children

Supplemental details on the methods as well as supplemental Tables and Figures. Figure S1, Learning-related changes in evoked-related fields over the left frontal region (analysis in sensor space). Grand average time courses of ERFs for LNO and UNO non-objects at S1 (LNO: black hyphenated line, UNO: gray hyphenated line) and S2 (LNO: black line; UNO: gray line). Significant differences over these sensors are identified 552–656 msec post-stimulus onset. Figure S2, Learning-related changes in evoked-related fields over (a) the right frontal and (b) right anterior temporal regions (analysis in sensor space). Grand average time courses of activation for the LNO and UNO stimuli at S1 (LNO: black hyphenated line, UNO: gray hyphenated line) and S2 (LNO: black line; UNO: gray line). Significant differences over these sensors are identified around 724 and 572 msec post-stimulus onset, respectively, but data inspection did not consistently reveal obvious differences in the time course and amplitude of evoked magnetic responses for LNO as compared to never taught non objects (UNO). Table S1, Random analysis results in the source space. Brain regions showing higher activity in the pre-learning session compared to the post-learning session during the MEG task (LNO S1>S2 masked exclusively for between-sessions repetition effects for untaught non objects (exclusive mask UNO S2 vs. S1)). Table S2, Common patterns of activation to both S1 and S2. Null conjunction analysis revealing patterns of activation common to both S1 and S2 in the source space during object identification. Table S3, Random analysis results in the source space. Main effect of brain activity during object identification in each session. LNO S1; S2.
(DOC)