Replication Data for "Forcing the President's Hand: How the U.S. Congress Shapes Foreign Policy Through Sanctions Legislation"

Given the U.S. president’s leading role in many areas of American foreign policy, one might expect the president to prevail in executive-legislative clashes over economic sanctions. In this paper, I show that, with surprising frequency, U.S. legislators overcome presidential opposition to their sanctions proposals and induce the president to take foreign policy actions that he or she would not otherwise take. My argument explains why the president often signs and implements sanctions legislation despite considering it inadvisable, as well as how sanctions legislation can influence foreign policy actions, the behavior of foreign governments, or international diplomacy in other ways. I support the argument with descriptive statistics based on an original data set of over 100 legislative sanctions proposals and a case study of the effects of legislative initiatives targeting Iran over a period of two decades. The paper’s findings show that legislative activity is more important than some previous research on sanctions and U.S. foreign policy suggests.